Recently, cases of abuse have been developed by airline companies against passengers. There are several protests about missing equipment, the flight over the reservation, the flight delay and its elimination. In fact, even after paying the maximum ticket, customers do not get the type of administration they deserve. Among the highlights, stand out the situation of the facilities that lack. Gears are guaranteed according to the Montréal tradition around the world. The Montreal Convention appeared in 1999. However, it was incorporated into the British legislation through "Carriage via Air Act" in 2002.
A few years ago, this tradition of passengers was only subject to travel protection cases and airlines did not leave any discipline about their waste when taking care of luggage. They were represented by the tradition of Warsaw.
The Montreal Convention is considered a changing point where airlines should begin to reflect on the interests of buyers, rather than revenues. The tradition of Montreal is a global tradition and its suitability consists of luggage luggage and a considerable amount of things identified with the safety of the flight and the demands of passengers, such as acts of fear of death and the disappearance of passengers . However, we will limit this issue to cases that are lacking in baggage. How about watching it.
The first part, Article 1 of the Montreal Convention characterizes the adequacy of the law. It is relevant for all carriages of people, things and load exercises performed through a plane. It is equally relevant to the flying machine that transmits passengers. Whatever the case, article 2 gives a special case to the postal administrations and excludes them from this law.
The Order offers compensation to passengers that the things in the process have been lost, granted or modified, to the point that it was under the control of the carrier.
The most notable that can be guaranteed for losses, delays or alterations is about 1,000 pounds per browser based on the cash conversion scale.
There are three terms that we have to understand about this gear with delay of definition, lost luggage or damaged equipment. Maybe you think, what is the contrast between them and how is the carrier grouped in this premise? We should observe it in detail.
Section III, article 19 of the Law, has eliminated the duty of delayed luggage. It argues, unquestionably, that carriers would have the duty once, things have been registered or when they have ownership. Article 22 characterizes delayed gear. At the time the baggage disappears, an airplane has 21 days to locate the missing gear. Up to this point, the luggage would be known as delayed gear. With the possibility that he can not do it, the lost equipment would be delegated to him in the missing luggage.
There is no established control that refers to how compensation can be determined when there is a delay of luggage. The airship can pay every day by ensuring that the gear is located or you can decide on a timely solution. Also, some airlines may require reception as a confirmation before they pay for late baggage.
Section 3, article 22 characterizes lost luggage. Expresses that if the aircraft could not locate the baggage it lacks for more than 21 days, it would be called lost equipment.
While an assessment of claims was made, the aviation routes would evaluate the estimation of luggage. If you have given the opportunity to do so under article 24, you will request the redemption of the related items and you can request receipts. It is likely that they will not give you all the claim, since their things could have been old. The biggest risk for an airplane is 1000 SDR that is characterized in article 2 of article 21. If you are looking for a higher demand, you can select the travel protection.
Article 10 characterizes the obligation of both the passenger and the carrier. Both the obligation of the airlines to discover the missing luggage, as well as the passenger inform them. In the possibility of discovering a baggage that has been harmed, at this point it must be immediately explained. At this time, you must fill in a framework with the name of "property anomaly" in the luggage work area. In any case, there is no legal requirement to send a report to the carrier company and they can not expel your case with the premise of not having a report.
Article 17 establishes the obligation and the degree of compensation for the damage. In case your equipment is damaged, the aircraft would confirm the reason for the damage and your compensation obligation would only be if things were blocked and keys to airlines.
There is a formal complaint that must be submitted to the aircraft within 7 days. The report itself is insufficient. They will then evaluate the claim made and may request receipts from harmful products.
There is a contrast between greed and complaint. The report is registered when, inform the problem in the configuration of the luggage territory at the aircraft terminal. Objection is a letter that you think in yourselves and send it to the carrier. There is no compulsory pre-requisite to record a report to make a sound.
Lost or missing items
Although there is an agreement for lost and missing things, proving them is extremely problematic. Most airline companies, clearly declared, prevented things that should not be transmitted in luggage. You are constantly asked to not transmit things that have a great incentive for your luggage.
Article 36 of part III clearly characterizes the significance of progressive transport by air. It states that you have different methods of correspondence insured under Article 1, and to the possibility that you have assigned the property to airlines, you could have compensation if there was a need for luggage. It clearly states that you can file a claim against any of the operators. Airlines can not accuse different airline companies and deny the demand on this premise, as this would be a rupture of the aircraft tradition. Both will be mutually risky as it is clarified in article 36 of paragraph 36 of the tradition.
The gear of the lodge is not the duty of an airplane. You have to watch over your care. In any case, under unusual conditions, airlines may be considered as responsible for presenting the luggage.
How to file a claim?
Article 31, which is identified with the timely warning of the protests, expresses that a case of delayed or missing baggage should be transmitted to the notification presenting a seriousness in the composition. The event courses planned to present the grievance in the composition are 7 days if there should be an incident of processed baggage or 14 days if there should be an incidence of Loading. The possibility of occurrence of event delay is 21 days.
You should also try to report the case to the board when you discover that the baggage is missing or damaged. Receiving the report you will get will help you base your protest. Keep in mind that recording reports is not an impulse as some airlines may indicate, but simply reinforces your case.
In the same way, along with the confusion the receipts of the products that you get in the injured state are joined. In case you delay the computer, you will have received your luggage when you enter. Tell the protest and connect a duplicate.
You can approach your visit to obtain some of the most important printed material for the documentation of the claim. Always indicate the correct problems and the things that were in progress that abstained or harmed.
Although we have more than 120 nations on board to take care of the problems of passengers through the tradition of Montreal, their use on the ground is not legitimately done. Airline companies constantly bother customers by denying claims that locate reasons such as lack of reports or receipts. A request is made to the customers to indicate the tests and they make a request for the visit that usually loses time. In fact, with the ability to send receipts by email, you call the aircraft terminal to terminate different customs, which lets you waste the time of the passenger and also its provocation. In fact, once you have presented all the evidence and the conventions have finished, the probability of obtaining complete compensation for your team is low. The Montréal tradition does not establish the level of reasoning measure that can be produced by estimating the article according to its age.
Another deficiency is an instance of missing luggage in the middle of the corresponding flights. However, we have clear traditions according to the Montréal tradition, with regard to the joint risk of both airlines. Airlines are reliably discovering a strategy known as "phenomenal conditions" to deny the guarantee of passengers.
Officials must work afterwards, decreasing the ideal opportunity for passengers to apply for their demand. They should also work after reducing the discomfort of passengers and a ton of printed material.
Before the Montreal Convention was restricted and merged into the laws of the United Kingdom, passengers only trusted in the protection of the trip. In any case, after that the passengers have been insured under this law. However, the largest amount you can claim can be low and you will not get full compensation, but this is a measure to insure the buyer's interests. This additionally is a discipline and a danger of notoriety for aircraft if they use laxity while doing operations.